What are the chances of seeing a Macrosoma heliconiaria in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Macrosoma heliconiaria sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 139th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Macrosoma heliconiaria in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
January and February
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Macrosoma heliconiaria in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and July–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Macrosoma heliconiaria?
Between midnight and 3 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Macrosoma heliconiaria sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Macrosoma heliconiaria?
Only Braulio Carrillo National Park, in our data
Braulio Carrillo National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Macrosoma heliconiaria sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Macrosoma heliconiaria live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Macrosoma heliconiaria that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Banded Peacock (about 40%), Walker's Moth (about 40%) and Red-Washed Satyr (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Macrosoma heliconiaria sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Macrosoma heliconiaria is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.