What are the chances of seeing a Cerenopus concolor in Cabo Pulmo National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cerenopus concolor sighting in Cabo Pulmo National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 16th most-seen of the 22 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cerenopus concolor in Cabo Pulmo National Park?
June
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Cerenopus concolor in Cabo Pulmo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May and July–December, the lowest months. That is one of Cabo Pulmo National Park's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 120 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Cerenopus concolor?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cerenopus concolor sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Cabo Pulmo National Park the best place to see a Cerenopus concolor?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Cerenopus concolor sightings, Cabo Pulmo National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Joshua Tree National Park (United States, about 10%) and Bahía de Loreto National Park (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Cerenopus concolor live in Cabo Pulmo National Park?
Same family: Tenebrionidae
The closest relatives of the Cerenopus concolor that you can see in Cabo Pulmo National Park (family Tenebrionidae, Darkling Beetles) are Eleodes eschscholtzii (about 20%) and Philolithus aegrotus (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cerenopus concolor sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cerenopus concolor is recorded against all the insects logged in Cabo Pulmo National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.