What are the chances of seeing a Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil in Cairngorms National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil sighting in Cairngorms National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 260th most-seen of the 300 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil in Cairngorms National Park?
May–June and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil in Cairngorms National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and September–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cairngorms National Park the best place to see a Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil sightings, Cairngorms National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil live in Cairngorms National Park?
Same order: Coleoptera
The closest relatives of the Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil that you can see in Cairngorms National Park (order Coleoptera, Beetles) are Woodland Dor Beetle (about 40%), Two-Banded Longhorn Beetle (about 30%) and Green Tiger Beetle (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Birch Leaf-Rolling Weevil is recorded against all the insects logged in Cairngorms National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.