Dundubia nagarasingna
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cat Tien National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ho Chi Minh City | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 2 | Bangkok | 🇹🇭 Thailand |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dundubia nagarasingna sighting in Cat Tien National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 108th most-seen of the 125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March and April
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Dundubia nagarasingna in Cat Tien National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to February, the lowest months. Those are among Cat Tien National Park's driest months, with about 55 mm of rain a month against 490 mm in July.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dundubia nagarasingna sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Only Cat Tien National Park, in our data
Cat Tien National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Dundubia nagarasingna sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Dundubia nagarasingna that you can see in Cat Tien National Park (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Pyrops coelestinus (about 30%) and Sugarcane Spittlebug (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dundubia nagarasingna is recorded against all the insects logged in Cat Tien National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
