Microhyla ninhthuanensis
Silhouette: Vijay Karthick · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cat Tien National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ho Chi Minh City | 🇻🇳 Vietnam |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Ninh Thuan Narrow-mouth Frog sighting in Cat Tien National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 15th most-seen of the 21 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Ninh Thuan Narrow-mouth Frog in Cat Tien National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, March–May and August–October, the lowest months. That is one of Cat Tien National Park's wettest months, with about 490 mm of rain against 15 mm in February.
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ninh Thuan Narrow-mouth Frog sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Cat Tien National Park, in our data
Cat Tien National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Ninh Thuan Narrow-mouth Frog sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Microhyla
The closest relatives of the Ninh Thuan Narrow-mouth Frog that you can see in Cat Tien National Park (genus Microhyla, Rice Frogs) are Mukhlesur's Narrow-mouthed Frog (about 40%), Arcuate-spotted Pygmy Frog (about 20%) and Butler's Ricefrog (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ninh Thuan Narrow-mouth Frog is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Cat Tien National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
