Pythonides jovianus
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lago de Yojoa | 🇭🇳 Honduras | |
| 2 | Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park | 🇭🇳 Honduras | |
| 3 | Tenorio Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 4 | Arenal Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belo Horizonte | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pythonides jovianus sighting in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 53rd most-seen of the 80 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February, May, July and September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Pythonides jovianus in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, August and October–January, the lowest months.
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pythonides jovianus sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
2nd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Pythonides jovianus sightings, Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 20%).
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Pythonides jovianus that you can see in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Cream-Spotted Tigerwing (about 30%), Rusted Clearwing-Satyr (about 30%) and Banded Peacock (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pythonides jovianus is recorded against all the insects logged in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
