What are the chances of seeing a Scotch Argus in Cévennes National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Scotch Argus sighting in Cévennes National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 666th most-seen of the 996 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scotch Argus in Cévennes National Park?
July and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Scotch Argus in Cévennes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to June, the lowest months. Those are among Cévennes National Park's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain a month against 260 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Scotch Argus?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scotch Argus sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cévennes National Park the best place to see a Scotch Argus?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Scotch Argus sightings, Cévennes National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cairngorms National Park (United Kingdom, about 40%), Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 30%) and Vanoise National Park (France, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Scotch Argus live in Cévennes National Park?
Same genus: Erebia
The closest relatives of the Scotch Argus that you can see in Cévennes National Park (genus Erebia, Alpines) are Piedmont Ringlet (about 10%), Autumn Ringlet (about 10%) and Arran Brown (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scotch Argus sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scotch Argus is recorded against all the insects logged in Cévennes National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.