What are the chances of seeing an Ochre-backed Woodpecker in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ochre-backed Woodpecker sighting in Chapada Diamantina National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 193rd most-seen of the 271 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ochre-backed Woodpecker in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
April and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Ochre-backed Woodpecker in Chapada Diamantina National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–September and November–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ochre-backed Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ochre-backed Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see an Ochre-backed Woodpecker?
Only Chapada Diamantina National Park, in our data
Chapada Diamantina National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Ochre-backed Woodpecker sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Ochre-backed Woodpecker live in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Ochre-backed Woodpecker that you can see in Chapada Diamantina National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Spotted Piculet (about 30%) and Campo Flicker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ochre-backed Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ochre-backed Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Chapada Diamantina National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.