Monopis argillacea

Monopis argillacea

Monopis argillacea

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Auckland

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%

16 Verified sightings at Auckland
February Best month

About the Monopis argillacea

Monopis argillacea is a moth of the family Tineidae first described by Edward Meyrick in 1893. It is found in Australia and New Zealand. Wikipedia →

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Auckland 🇳🇿 New Zealand
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Monopis argillacea in Auckland?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Monopis argillacea sighting in Auckland on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 324th most-seen of the 689 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Monopis argillacea in Auckland?

August and December–February

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Monopis argillacea in Auckland on a given day, against under 5% in March–July and September–November, the lowest months.

Where else can you see a Monopis argillacea?

Only Auckland, in our data

Auckland is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Monopis argillacea sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Which relatives of the Monopis argillacea live in Auckland?

Same genus: Monopis

The closest relatives of the Monopis argillacea that you can see in Auckland (genus Monopis) are Wool Moth (about 10%), Dead Sheep Moth (about 10%) and Bird Nest Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Monopis argillacea sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Monopis argillacea is recorded against all the insects logged in Auckland (16 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Auckland