Macrosiagon cruentum

Macrosiagon cruentum

Macrosiagon cruentum

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Baltimore

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

8 Verified sightings at Baltimore
5 In 1 park From 2019 to 2026
June Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Big Cypress National Preserve 🇺🇸 United States
~10%

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Baltimore 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
2 Washington 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
3 Houston 🇺🇸 United States
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Macrosiagon cruentum in Baltimore?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Macrosiagon cruentum sighting in Baltimore on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 445th most-seen of the 705 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Macrosiagon cruentum in Baltimore?

June and August

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Macrosiagon cruentum in Baltimore on a given day, against under 5% in July and September–May, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see a Macrosiagon cruentum?

Between 11 am and 2 pm

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Macrosiagon cruentum sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Baltimore the best place to see a Macrosiagon cruentum?

Yes

Of the 3 cities where we can rate Macrosiagon cruentum sightings, Baltimore has the highest daily chance: under 5%. Next come Washington (United States, under 5%) and Houston (United States, under 5%).

Where does the Macrosiagon cruentum sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Macrosiagon cruentum is recorded against all the insects logged in Baltimore (8 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Baltimore