Erythrodiplax media

Erythrodiplax media

Erythrodiplax media

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Buenos Aires

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%

118 Verified sightings at Buenos Aires
7 In 1 park From 2019 to 2026
March Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Iguazú National Park 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Buenos Aires 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%
2 Porto Alegre 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
3 São Paulo 🇧🇷 Brazil
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing an Erythrodiplax media in Buenos Aires?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Erythrodiplax media sighting in Buenos Aires on a given day, based on 118 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 113th most-seen of the 558 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see an Erythrodiplax media in Buenos Aires?

November to April

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Erythrodiplax media in Buenos Aires on a given day, against under 5% in May to October, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see an Erythrodiplax media?

Between 9 am and noon

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Erythrodiplax media sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Buenos Aires the best place to see an Erythrodiplax media?

Yes

Of the 3 cities where we can rate Erythrodiplax media sightings, Buenos Aires has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Porto Alegre (Brazil, about 10%) and São Paulo (Brazil, under 5%).

Where does the Erythrodiplax media sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Erythrodiplax media is recorded against all the insects logged in Buenos Aires (118 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Buenos Aires