Neocalvia anastomozans

Neocalvia anastomozans

Neocalvia anastomozans

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Curitiba

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%

9 Verified sightings at Curitiba
December Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Curitiba 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
2 São Paulo 🇧🇷 Brazil
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Neocalvia anastomozans in Curitiba?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Neocalvia anastomozans sighting in Curitiba on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 105th most-seen of the 177 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Neocalvia anastomozans in Curitiba?

July and December

In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Neocalvia anastomozans in Curitiba on a given day, against under 5% in February, April–June and August–October, the lowest months.

Is Curitiba the best place to see a Neocalvia anastomozans?

Yes

Of the 2 cities where we can rate Neocalvia anastomozans sightings, Curitiba has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come São Paulo (Brazil, under 5%).

Which relatives of the Neocalvia anastomozans live in Curitiba?

Same family: Coccinellidae

The closest relatives of the Neocalvia anastomozans that you can see in Curitiba (family Coccinellidae, Lady Beetles) are Asian Lady Beetle (about 50%), Eriopis connexa (about 20%) and Convergent Lady Beetle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Neocalvia anastomozans sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Neocalvia anastomozans is recorded against all the insects logged in Curitiba (9 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Curitiba