Larisa subsolana
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%
Larisa is a genus of moths belonging to the subfamily Olethreutinae of the family Tortricidae. It contains only one species, Larisa subsolana, which is found in North America, where it has been recorded from Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Ontario, Quebec, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia.
The larvae feed on Carya illinoensis. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Austin | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Dallas | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 3 | Houston | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 4 | New York City | 🇺🇸 United States |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Dark-Based Larisa Moth sighting in Dallas on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 601st most-seen of the 1412 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dark-Based Larisa Moth in Dallas on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months.
2nd of 4
Of the 4 cities where we can rate Dark-Based Larisa Moth sightings, Dallas ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Austin (United States, about 10%).
Same family: Tortricidae
The closest relatives of the Dark-Based Larisa Moth that you can see in Dallas (family Tortricidae, Tortricid Leafroller Moths) are Garden Tortrix (about 10%), Filbertworm Moth (about 10%) and Lentiginos Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dark-Based Larisa Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Dallas (26 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
