Macellina souchongia

Macellina souchongia

Macellina souchongia

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Hong Kong

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%

15 Verified sightings at Hong Kong
July Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Guangzhou 🇨🇳 China
~10%
2 Tuen Mun 🇨🇳 China
~10%
3 Hong Kong 🇨🇳 China
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Macellina souchongia in Hong Kong?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Macellina souchongia sighting in Hong Kong on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 555th most-seen of the 1125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Macellina souchongia in Hong Kong?

July and October

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Macellina souchongia in Hong Kong on a given day, against under 5% in August–September and November–June, the lowest months.

Is Hong Kong the best place to see a Macellina souchongia?

3rd of 3

Of the 3 cities where we can rate Macellina souchongia sightings, Hong Kong ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Guangzhou (China, about 10%) and Tuen Mun (China, about 10%).

Which relatives of the Macellina souchongia live in Hong Kong?

Same order: Phasmida

The closest relatives of the Macellina souchongia that you can see in Hong Kong (order Phasmida, Stick Insects) are Ramulus caii (about 10%), Phraortes stomphax (about 10%) and Huananphasma amicum (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Macellina souchongia sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Macellina souchongia is recorded against all the insects logged in Hong Kong (15 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Hong Kong