Maguda suffusa
Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Hong Kong

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%

26 Verified sightings at Hong Kong
June Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Hong Kong 🇨🇳 China
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Maguda suffusa in Hong Kong?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Maguda suffusa sighting in Hong Kong on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 362nd most-seen of the 1125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Maguda suffusa in Hong Kong?

April and June–August

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Maguda suffusa in Hong Kong on a given day, against under 5% in May and September–March, the lowest months. Those are among Hong Kong's wettest months, with about 200 mm of rain a month against 25 mm in December.

Where else can you see a Maguda suffusa?

Only Hong Kong, in our data

Hong Kong is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Maguda suffusa sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Which relatives of the Maguda suffusa live in Hong Kong?

Same family: Erebidae

The closest relatives of the Maguda suffusa that you can see in Hong Kong (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Banyan Tussock Moth (about 20%), Orvasca subnotata (about 20%) and Zhejiang Tussock Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Maguda suffusa sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Maguda suffusa is recorded against all the insects logged in Hong Kong (26 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Hong Kong