What are the chances of seeing a Vinous-throated Parrotbill in Jinhua?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Vinous-throated Parrotbill sighting in Jinhua on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 24th most-seen of the 74 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Vinous-throated Parrotbill in Jinhua?
December
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Vinous-throated Parrotbill in Jinhua on a given day, against about 20% in May and October–November, the lowest months. That is one of Jinhua's driest months, with about 65 mm of rain against 300 mm in June. January–March and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Vinous-throated Parrotbill?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Vinous-throated Parrotbill sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Jinhua the best place to see a Vinous-throated Parrotbill?
17th of 33
Of the 33 cities where we can rate Vinous-throated Parrotbill sightings, Jinhua ranks 17th at about 30%. The best odds are in Daejeon (South Korea, about 70%), Seoul (South Korea, about 60%) and Busan (South Korea, about 60%).
Which relatives of the Vinous-throated Parrotbill live in Jinhua?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Vinous-throated Parrotbill that you can see in Jinhua (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Light-vented Bulbul (about 70%), Cinereous Tit (about 60%) and Long-tailed Shrike (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Vinous-throated Parrotbill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Vinous-throated Parrotbill is recorded against all the birds logged in Jinhua (15 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.