Microhyla mukhlesuri
Silhouette: Vijay Karthick · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Advertisement call0:46
Thailand · 2014
© Marc Anderson · XC1102617 · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Recording1:07
Thailand · 2021
© remigis · iNaturalist · CC BY-NC 4.0
Recording0:13
Vietnam · 2025
© Alex Allen · iNaturalist · CC BY-NC 4.0
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cat Tien National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 2 | Khao Sok National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 3 | Kaeng Krachan National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 4 | Khao Yai National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ho Chi Minh City | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 2 | Bangkok | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 3 | Kuala Lumpur | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 4 | Singapore | 🇸🇬 Singapore |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Mukhlesur's Narrow-mouthed Frog sighting in Kuala Lumpur on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 9th most-seen of the 17 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Mukhlesur's Narrow-mouthed Frog in Kuala Lumpur on a given day, against under 5% in January, April and July–August, the lowest months.
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Mukhlesur's Narrow-mouthed Frog sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
3rd of 4
Of the 4 cities where we can rate Mukhlesur's Narrow-mouthed Frog sightings, Kuala Lumpur ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam, about 20%) and Bangkok (Thailand, about 10%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Mukhlesur's Narrow-mouthed Frog is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Kuala Lumpur (18 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
