Odites kollarella
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%
Odites kollarella is a moth in the family Depressariidae. It was described by Oronzio Gabriele Costa in 1832. It is found in Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Croatia, Moldova and Greece, as well as on Corsica. The wingspan is about 12.5 mm. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cévennes National Park | 🇫🇷 France |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lisbon | 🇵🇹 Portugal |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Odites kollarella sighting in Lisbon on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 405th most-seen of the 441 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Odites kollarella in Lisbon on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months. That is one of Lisbon's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 95 mm in November.
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Odites kollarella sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Lisbon, in our data
Lisbon is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Odites kollarella sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Odites kollarella that you can see in Lisbon (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Speckled Wood (about 30%), Red Admiral (about 20%) and Old World Swallowtail (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Odites kollarella is recorded against all the insects logged in Lisbon (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
