Four-Spotted Tree Cricket

Four-Spotted Tree Cricket

Oecanthus quadripunctatus

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Los Angeles

In 3 days ~10%

6 Verified sightings at Los Angeles
June Best month

About the Four-Spotted Tree Cricket

Oecanthus quadripunctatus is a "common tree cricket" in the subfamily Oecanthinae ("tree crickets"). A common name for O. quadripunctatus is four-spotted tree cricket. It is found in North America. Wikipedia →

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Boston 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
2 Toronto 🇨🇦 Canada
<5%
3 New York City 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
4 Los Angeles 🇺🇸 United States
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Four-Spotted Tree Cricket in Los Angeles?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Four-Spotted Tree Cricket sighting in Los Angeles on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 715th most-seen of the 851 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Four-Spotted Tree Cricket in Los Angeles?

Any time of year

In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Four-Spotted Tree Cricket in Los Angeles on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.

Is Los Angeles the best place to see a Four-Spotted Tree Cricket?

Among the best

Of the 4 cities where we can rate Four-Spotted Tree Cricket sightings, Los Angeles ranks 4th at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Boston (United States, under 5%), Toronto (Canada, under 5%) and New York City (United States, under 5%).

Where does the Four-Spotted Tree Cricket sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Four-Spotted Tree Cricket is recorded against all the insects logged in Los Angeles (6 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Los Angeles