Silhouette: Mattia Menchetti · PhyloPic
Dolymorpha jada
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cumbres de Monterrey National Park | 🇲🇽 Mexico |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Luis Potosí | 🇲🇽 México | |
| 2 | Monterrey | 🇲🇽 México | |
| 3 | Guadalajara | 🇲🇽 México | |
| 4 | Mexico City | 🇲🇽 México |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dolymorpha jada sighting in Monterrey on a given day, based on 31 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 114th most-seen of the 413 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January and June–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dolymorpha jada in Monterrey on a given day, against under 5% in February–May and November–December, the lowest months. Those are among Monterrey's wettest months, with about 85 mm of rain a month against 20 mm in February.
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dolymorpha jada sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 4 cities where we can rate Dolymorpha jada sightings, Monterrey ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in San Luis Potosí (México, about 10%).
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Dolymorpha jada that you can see in Monterrey (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Ceraunus Blue (about 10%), Reakirt's Blue (about 10%) and Callicista columella (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dolymorpha jada is recorded against all the insects logged in Monterrey (31 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
