Silhouette: Michael Day · PhyloPic
Rhagio tringaria
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Bear Rainforest | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 2 | Acadia National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 3 | Cairngorms National Park | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 4 | Bavarian Forest National Park | 🇩🇪 Germany | |
| 5 | Wadden Sea National Park | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Helsinki | 🇫🇮 Finland | |
| 2 | Rotterdam [The Hague] | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | |
| 3 | Vancouver | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 4 | Liverpool | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 5 | Leeds | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 6 | Birmingham | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 7 | Saint Petersburg | 🇷🇺 Russia | |
| 8 | Seattle | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 9 | Kyiv | 🇺🇦 Ukraine | |
| 10 | Toronto | 🇨🇦 Canada |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rhagio tringaria sighting in Moscow on a given day, based on 31 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 323rd most-seen of the 1111 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rhagio tringaria in Moscow on a given day, against under 5% in August to June, the lowest months. That is one of Moscow's wettest months, with about 95 mm of rain against 40 mm in February.
Between 4 and 7 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rhagio tringaria sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
12th of 17
Of the 17 cities where we can rate Rhagio tringaria sightings, Moscow ranks 12th at under 5%. The best odds are in Helsinki (Finland, about 10%), Rotterdam [The Hague] (Netherlands, about 10%) and Vancouver (Canada, about 10%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rhagio tringaria is recorded against all the insects logged in Moscow (31 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
