Tartessus ferrugineus

Tartessus ferrugineus

Tartessus ferrugineus

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Naha

In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%

6 Verified sightings at Naha
August Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Naha 🇯🇵 Japan
~10%
2 Taipei 🇹🇼 Taiwan
~10%
3 Singapore 🇸🇬 Singapore
<5%
4 Kaohsiung 🇹🇼 Taiwan
<5%
5 Tokyo 🇯🇵 Japan
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Tartessus ferrugineus in Naha?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tartessus ferrugineus sighting in Naha on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 78th most-seen of the 94 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Tartessus ferrugineus in Naha?

August

In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Tartessus ferrugineus in Naha on a given day, against under 5% in June, September–October and December–April, the lowest months.

Is Naha the best place to see a Tartessus ferrugineus?

Yes

Of the 5 cities where we can rate Tartessus ferrugineus sightings, Naha has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Taipei (Taiwan, about 10%) and Singapore (Singapore, under 5%).

Which relatives of the Tartessus ferrugineus live in Naha?

Same order: Hemiptera

The closest relatives of the Tartessus ferrugineus that you can see in Naha (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Calliphara excellens (about 40%), Graptopsaltria bimaculata (about 40%) and Black Giant Cicada (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Tartessus ferrugineus sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Tartessus ferrugineus is recorded against all the insects logged in Naha (6 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Naha