Erythromma viridulum
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
The small red-eyed damselfly (Erythromma viridulum) is a member of the damselfly family Coenagrionidae. It is very similar to the red-eyed damselfly. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bavarian Forest National Park | 🇩🇪 Germany |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brussels | 🇧🇪 Belgium | |
| 2 | Rostov-on-Don | 🇷🇺 Russia | |
| 3 | Jerusalem | 🇮🇱 Israel | |
| 4 | Kyiv | 🇺🇦 Ukraine | |
| 5 | Rotterdam [The Hague] | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | |
| 6 | Budapest | 🇭🇺 Hungary | |
| 7 | Paris | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 8 | Leeds | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 9 | Bucharest | 🇷🇴 Romania | |
| 10 | Warsaw | 🇵🇱 Poland |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Small Red-Eyed Damselfly sighting in Paris on a given day, based on 62 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 183rd most-seen of the 916 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June to September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Small Red-Eyed Damselfly in Paris on a given day, against under 5% in October to May, the lowest months.
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Small Red-Eyed Damselfly sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 24 cities where we can rate Small Red-Eyed Damselfly sightings, Paris ranks 7th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Brussels (Belgium, about 10%), Rostov-on-Don (Russia, about 10%) and Jerusalem (Israel, about 10%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Small Red-Eyed Damselfly is recorded against all the insects logged in Paris (62 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
