Erythrodiplax media

Erythrodiplax media

Erythrodiplax media

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Porto Alegre

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%

5 Verified sightings at Porto Alegre
7 In 1 park From 2019 to 2026
February Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Iguazú National Park 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Buenos Aires 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%
2 Porto Alegre 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
3 São Paulo 🇧🇷 Brazil
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing an Erythrodiplax media in Porto Alegre?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Erythrodiplax media sighting in Porto Alegre on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 196th most-seen of the 226 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see an Erythrodiplax media in Porto Alegre?

December to April

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Erythrodiplax media in Porto Alegre on a given day, against under 5% in May to November, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see an Erythrodiplax media?

Between 9 am and noon

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Erythrodiplax media sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Porto Alegre the best place to see an Erythrodiplax media?

Among the best

Of the 3 cities where we can rate Erythrodiplax media sightings, Porto Alegre ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Buenos Aires (Argentina, about 10%).

Where does the Erythrodiplax media sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Erythrodiplax media is recorded against all the insects logged in Porto Alegre (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Porto Alegre