Largus rufipennis
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El Palmar National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosario | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Curitiba | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 3 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 4 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Largus rufipennis sighting in Rosario on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 71st most-seen of the 82 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May–June and September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Largus rufipennis in Rosario on a given day, against under 5% in January–March, July–August and October–November, the lowest months. Those are among Rosario's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain a month against 150 mm in March.
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Largus rufipennis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 5 cities where we can rate Largus rufipennis sightings, Rosario has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Curitiba (Brazil, about 10%) and Buenos Aires (Argentina, about 10%).
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Largus rufipennis that you can see in Rosario (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Cosmoclopius poecilus (about 20%), Antiteuchus mixtus (about 20%) and Zelus leucogrammus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Largus rufipennis is recorded against all the insects logged in Rosario (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
