Euglyphis asapha
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tenorio Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 2 | Corcovado National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 3 | Arenal Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 4 | Braulio Carrillo National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Euglyphis asapha sighting in Corcovado National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 77th most-seen of the 116 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January to March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Euglyphis asapha in Corcovado National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to December, the lowest months. Those are among Corcovado National Park's driest months, with about 90 mm of rain a month against 770 mm in October.
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Euglyphis asapha sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Euglyphis asapha sightings, Corcovado National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Euglyphis asapha that you can see in Corcovado National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Urania Swallowtail Moth (about 40%), Banded Peacock (about 40%) and Amathonte Morpho (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Euglyphis asapha is recorded against all the insects logged in Corcovado National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
