What are the chances of seeing a Black-Spotted Labyrinth in Cuc Phuong National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-Spotted Labyrinth sighting in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 82nd most-seen of the 126 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-Spotted Labyrinth in Cuc Phuong National Park?
June
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Black-Spotted Labyrinth in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and October–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-Spotted Labyrinth?
Between 5 and 8 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-Spotted Labyrinth sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Where else can you see a Black-Spotted Labyrinth?
Only Cuc Phuong National Park, in our data
Cuc Phuong National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Black-Spotted Labyrinth sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Black-Spotted Labyrinth live in Cuc Phuong National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Black-Spotted Labyrinth that you can see in Cuc Phuong National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Little Mapwing (about 50%), Himalayan Jester (about 50%) and Marbled Map (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-Spotted Labyrinth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-Spotted Labyrinth is recorded against all the insects logged in Cuc Phuong National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.