What are the chances of seeing a Black-capped Vireo in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-capped Vireo sighting in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 257th most-seen of the 275 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-capped Vireo in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-capped Vireo in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-capped Vireo?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-capped Vireo sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cumbres de Monterrey National Park the best place to see a Black-capped Vireo?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Black-capped Vireo sightings, Cumbres de Monterrey National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Big Bend National Park (United States, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Black-capped Vireo live in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Same genus: Vireo
The closest relatives of the Black-capped Vireo that you can see in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (genus Vireo, Vireos) are Hutton's Vireo (about 20%), Yellow-green Vireo (about 10%) and Blue-headed Vireo (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-capped Vireo sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-capped Vireo is recorded against all the birds logged in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.