Agrioglypta eurytusalis
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Agrioglypta eurytusalis is a moth in the family Crambidae described by Francis Walker in 1859. It is found in southern India, Sri Lanka, Borneo, Cambodia, Thailand, Taiwan, Japan and Australia, where it has been recorded from northern Queensland. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Agrioglypta eurytusalis sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 254th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Agrioglypta eurytusalis in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April and December, the lowest months. Those are among Daintree National Park's driest months, with about 85 mm of rain a month against 380 mm in January.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Agrioglypta eurytusalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Agrioglypta eurytusalis sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Agrioglypta
The closest relatives of the Agrioglypta eurytusalis that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Agrioglypta) are Agrioglypta itysalis (about 10%) and Agrioglypta excelsalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Agrioglypta eurytusalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
