Eublemma lozostropha
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Eublemma lozostropha is a species of moth of the family Erebidae first described by Alfred Jefferis Turner in 1902. It is found from Kalbarri in Western Australia north around northern Australia, through central Australia and down the eastern coast to southern New South Wales. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Eublemma lozostropha sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 653rd most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Eublemma lozostropha in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to April, the lowest months. That is one of Daintree National Park's driest months, with about 80 mm of rain against 380 mm in January.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eublemma lozostropha sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Eublemma lozostropha sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Eublemma
The closest relatives of the Eublemma lozostropha that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Eublemma) are Eublemma roseana (about 10%), Oriental Banner (about 10%) and Eublemma crassiuscula (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eublemma lozostropha is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
