Glyphodes eurygania
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
Glyphodes eurygania is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Herbert Druce in 1902. It is found in Papua New Guinea, among other places. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Glyphodes eurygania sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 24 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 123rd most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January and May
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Glyphodes eurygania in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and August–September, the lowest months. Those are among Daintree National Park's wettest months, with about 240 mm of rain a month against 50 mm in September.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Glyphodes eurygania sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Glyphodes eurygania sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Glyphodes
The closest relatives of the Glyphodes eurygania that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Glyphodes) are Glyphodes canthusalis (about 20%), Glyphodes doleschalii (about 10%) and Glyphodes stolalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Glyphodes eurygania is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (24 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
