Herpetogramma hipponalis
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Herpetogramma hipponalis is a species of moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Francis Walker in 1859. It is found in Malaysia, China, the Keeling Islands, Guadalcanal, New Guinea and Australia, where it has been recorded from the Northern Territory and Queensland. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Herpetogramma hipponalis sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 567th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Herpetogramma hipponalis in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, April and July–November, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Herpetogramma hipponalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Herpetogramma hipponalis sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Herpetogramma
The closest relatives of the Herpetogramma hipponalis that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Herpetogramma) are Grass Webworm Moth (about 10%), Herpetogramma cynaralis (about 10%) and Herpetogramma exculta (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Herpetogramma hipponalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
