Homoneura discoglauca
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singapore | 🇸🇬 Singapore |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Homoneura discoglauca sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 653rd most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March and April
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Homoneura discoglauca in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, May and July–December, the lowest months. Those are among Daintree National Park's wettest months, with about 250 mm of rain a month against 50 mm in September.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Homoneura discoglauca sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Homoneura discoglauca sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Lauxaniidae
The closest relatives of the Homoneura discoglauca that you can see in Daintree National Park (family Lauxaniidae, Lauxaniid Flies) are Mettinia suboceliifera (about 10%), Cephaloconus tenebrosus (about 10%) and Wawu queenslandensis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Homoneura discoglauca is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
