Nacoleia obliqualis
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
Nacoleia obliqualis is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by George Hampson in 1898. It is found in Australia, where it has been recorded from Queensland. Adults are brown with dark patches at the margin and the base of the wings. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Nacoleia obliqualis sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 123rd most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Nacoleia obliqualis in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and December, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Nacoleia obliqualis sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Nacoleia obliqualis sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Nacoleia obliqualis that you can see in Daintree National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Tetrernia teminitis (about 20%), Bean Leafroller (about 20%) and Banded Pearl (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Nacoleia obliqualis is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (26 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
