What are the chances of seeing a Palpita rhodocosta in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Palpita rhodocosta sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 745th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Palpita rhodocosta in Daintree National Park?
April and June–August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Palpita rhodocosta in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and September–March, the lowest months. Those are among Daintree National Park's driest months, with about 95 mm of rain a month against 380 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Palpita rhodocosta?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Palpita rhodocosta sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Palpita rhodocosta?
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Palpita rhodocosta sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Palpita rhodocosta live in Daintree National Park?
Same genus: Palpita
The closest relatives of the Palpita rhodocosta that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Palpita, Palpita Moths) are Palpita austrannulata (about 10%) and Palpita horakae (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Palpita rhodocosta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Palpita rhodocosta is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.