What are the chances of seeing a Rhinagrion elopurae in Danum Valley Conservation Area?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rhinagrion elopurae sighting in Danum Valley Conservation Area on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 68th most-seen of the 102 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rhinagrion elopurae in Danum Valley Conservation Area?
January
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Rhinagrion elopurae in Danum Valley Conservation Area on a given day, against under 5% in February–May, July–August and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rhinagrion elopurae?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rhinagrion elopurae sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Danum Valley Conservation Area the best place to see a Rhinagrion elopurae?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Rhinagrion elopurae sightings, Danum Valley Conservation Area ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Sepilok (Malaysia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rhinagrion elopurae live in Danum Valley Conservation Area?
Same order: Odonata
The closest relatives of the Rhinagrion elopurae that you can see in Danum Valley Conservation Area (order Odonata, Dragonflies and Damselflies) are Orange Skimmer (about 40%), Red Percher (about 30%) and Blue Marsh Hawk (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rhinagrion elopurae sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rhinagrion elopurae is recorded against all the insects logged in Danum Valley Conservation Area (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.