What are the chances of seeing a Coeliccia poungyi in Doi Inthanon National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Coeliccia poungyi sighting in Doi Inthanon National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 105th most-seen of the 153 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Coeliccia poungyi in Doi Inthanon National Park?
May and June
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Coeliccia poungyi in Doi Inthanon National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, April and July–December, the lowest months. Those are among Doi Inthanon National Park's wettest months, with about 280 mm of rain a month against 20 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Coeliccia poungyi?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Coeliccia poungyi sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Doi Inthanon National Park the best place to see a Coeliccia poungyi?
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Coeliccia poungyi sightings, Doi Inthanon National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Coeliccia poungyi live in Doi Inthanon National Park?
Same genus: Coeliccia
The closest relatives of the Coeliccia poungyi that you can see in Doi Inthanon National Park (genus Coeliccia) are Coeliccia loogali (about 20%) and Coeliccia chromothorax (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Coeliccia poungyi sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Coeliccia poungyi is recorded against all the insects logged in Doi Inthanon National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.