What are the chances of seeing an Austrocidaria bipartita in Egmont National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Austrocidaria bipartita sighting in Egmont National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 153rd most-seen of the 191 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Austrocidaria bipartita in Egmont National Park?
September and November–December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Austrocidaria bipartita in Egmont National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–August and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Austrocidaria bipartita?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Austrocidaria bipartita sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see an Austrocidaria bipartita?
Only Egmont National Park, in our data
Egmont National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Austrocidaria bipartita sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Austrocidaria bipartita live in Egmont National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Austrocidaria bipartita that you can see in Egmont National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Forest Semilooper (about 20%), Oblique-Waved Fern Looper (about 20%) and Common Forest Looper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Austrocidaria bipartita sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Austrocidaria bipartita is recorded against all the insects logged in Egmont National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.