Riodina lysippoides
In 3 days ~60% in a week ~90%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El Impenetrable National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Iberá National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | El Palmar National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosario | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | Cochabamba | 🇧🇴 Bolivia | |
| 4 | Montevideo | 🇺🇾 Uruguay | |
| 5 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Little Dancer Metalmark sighting in El Palmar National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 14th most-seen of the 35 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
September
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Little Dancer Metalmark in El Palmar National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–August and October, the lowest months.
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Little Dancer Metalmark sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Little Dancer Metalmark sightings, El Palmar National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 30%) and Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Little Dancer Metalmark that you can see in El Palmar National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Ortilia velica (about 40%), Number Eighty (about 40%) and Gulf Fritillary (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Little Dancer Metalmark is recorded against all the insects logged in El Palmar National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
