What are the chances of seeing a Corinna Daggerwing in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Corinna Daggerwing sighting in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 32nd most-seen of the 43 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Corinna Daggerwing in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
June
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Corinna Daggerwing in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–May and August–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Corinna Daggerwing?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Corinna Daggerwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Farallones de Cali National Natural Park the best place to see a Corinna Daggerwing?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Corinna Daggerwing sightings, Farallones de Cali National Natural Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Los Nevados National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Corinna Daggerwing live in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Same genus: Marpesia
The closest relatives of the Corinna Daggerwing that you can see in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (genus Marpesia, Daggerwings) are Spot-Banded Daggerwing (about 20%), Sunset Daggerwing (about 10%) and Waiter Daggerwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Corinna Daggerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Corinna Daggerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.