What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-crowned Antpitta in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-crowned Antpitta sighting in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 494th most-seen of the 542 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-crowned Antpitta in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-crowned Antpitta in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-crowned Antpitta?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-crowned Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Rufous-crowned Antpitta?
Only Farallones de Cali National Natural Park, in our data
Farallones de Cali National Natural Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Rufous-crowned Antpitta sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Rufous-crowned Antpitta live in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Rufous-crowned Antpitta that you can see in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Flame-rumped Tanager (about 70%), Black-billed Thrush (about 70%) and Blue-gray Tanager (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-crowned Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-crowned Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.