What are the chances of seeing a Bananaquit in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit sighting in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, based on 2,873 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 5th most-seen of the 542 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bananaquit in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
July
In that month about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, against about 60% in May and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bananaquit?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bananaquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Farallones de Cali National Natural Park the best place to see a Bananaquit?
7th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Bananaquit sightings, Farallones de Cali National Natural Park ranks 7th at about 70%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 90%), Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 90%) and Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (Mexico, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bananaquit live in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Bananaquit that you can see in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Flame-rumped Tanager (about 70%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 70%) and Green Honeycreeper (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bananaquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bananaquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (2,873 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.