What are the chances of seeing an Asaphodes aegrota in Fiordland National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Asaphodes aegrota sighting in Fiordland National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 171st most-seen of the 201 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Asaphodes aegrota in Fiordland National Park?
March and November–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Asaphodes aegrota in Fiordland National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and April–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Asaphodes aegrota?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Asaphodes aegrota sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Fiordland National Park the best place to see an Asaphodes aegrota?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Asaphodes aegrota sightings, Fiordland National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Rakiura National Park (New Zealand, about 10%) and Egmont National Park (New Zealand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Asaphodes aegrota live in Fiordland National Park?
Same genus: Asaphodes
The closest relatives of the Asaphodes aegrota that you can see in Fiordland National Park (genus Asaphodes) are Exquisite Carpet (about 10%), Large Striped Carpet (about 10%) and Bright Green Carpet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Asaphodes aegrota sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Asaphodes aegrota is recorded against all the insects logged in Fiordland National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.