What are the chances of seeing a Lustrous Copper in Grand Teton National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lustrous Copper sighting in Grand Teton National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 119th most-seen of the 140 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lustrous Copper in Grand Teton National Park?
June
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lustrous Copper in Grand Teton National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lustrous Copper?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lustrous Copper sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Grand Teton National Park the best place to see a Lustrous Copper?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Lustrous Copper sightings, Grand Teton National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Yosemite National Park (United States, about 20%), Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (United States, about 10%) and Glacier National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Lustrous Copper live in Grand Teton National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Lustrous Copper that you can see in Grand Teton National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Blue Copper (about 20%), Boisduval's Blue (about 20%) and Mariposa Copper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lustrous Copper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lustrous Copper is recorded against all the insects logged in Grand Teton National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.