What are the chances of seeing a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk in Grand Teton National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk sighting in Grand Teton National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 86th most-seen of the 140 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk in Grand Teton National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk in Grand Teton National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Grand Teton National Park the best place to see a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk sightings, Grand Teton National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Riding Mountain National Park (Canada, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk live in Grand Teton National Park?
Same genus: Sympetrum
The closest relatives of the Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk that you can see in Grand Teton National Park (genus Sympetrum, Meadowhawks) are Black Meadowhawk (about 10%) and Striped Meadowhawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk is recorded against all the insects logged in Grand Teton National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.