What are the chances of seeing a Western Wood Fly in Great Bear Rainforest?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Western Wood Fly sighting in Great Bear Rainforest on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 50th most-seen of the 235 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Western Wood Fly in Great Bear Rainforest?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Western Wood Fly in Great Bear Rainforest on a given day, against under 5% in September to May, the lowest months. That is one of Great Bear Rainforest's driest months, with about 150 mm of rain against 480 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Western Wood Fly?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Western Wood Fly sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Great Bear Rainforest the best place to see a Western Wood Fly?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Western Wood Fly sightings, Great Bear Rainforest has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Olympic National Park (United States, about 10%) and Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (Canada, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Western Wood Fly live in Great Bear Rainforest?
Same family: Syrphidae
The closest relatives of the Western Wood Fly that you can see in Great Bear Rainforest (family Syrphidae, Hover Flies) are Western Pond Fly (about 20%), Melanostoma mellina (about 20%) and Common Drone Fly (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Western Wood Fly sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Western Wood Fly is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Bear Rainforest (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.