Eucyclodes buprestaria
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Eucyclodes buprestaria is a moth of the family Geometridae. It is found in the southern half of Australia and in Tasmania. The wingspan is about 30 mm. The larvae feed on Cassytha glabella and Cassytha pubescens. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Eucyclodes buprestaria sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 226th most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Eucyclodes buprestaria in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to December, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eucyclodes buprestaria sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Great Otway National Park, in our data
Great Otway National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Eucyclodes buprestaria sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Eucyclodes buprestaria that you can see in Great Otway National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Australian Pug Moth (about 20%), Varied Grey Moth (about 20%) and Plantain Moth (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eucyclodes buprestaria is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
