What are the chances of seeing a Groove-billed Toucanet in Henri Pittier National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Groove-billed Toucanet sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 259 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 15th most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Groove-billed Toucanet in Henri Pittier National Park?
April
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Groove-billed Toucanet in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against about 10% in July, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Groove-billed Toucanet?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Groove-billed Toucanet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Groove-billed Toucanet?
Only Henri Pittier National Park, in our data
Henri Pittier National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Groove-billed Toucanet sightings: about 30% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Groove-billed Toucanet live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same order: Piciformes
The closest relatives of the Groove-billed Toucanet that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (order Piciformes, Woodpeckers and Allies) are Red-crowned Woodpecker (about 30%), Rufous-tailed Jacamar (about 20%) and Golden-olive Woodpecker (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Groove-billed Toucanet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Groove-billed Toucanet is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (259 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.