What are the chances of seeing a Golden-chevroned Tanager in Itatiaia National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-chevroned Tanager sighting in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, based on 1,228 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 17th most-seen of the 352 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-chevroned Tanager in Itatiaia National Park?
May
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-chevroned Tanager in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, against about 20% in February, the lowest month. That is one of Itatiaia National Park's driest months, with about 70 mm of rain against 330 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-chevroned Tanager?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-chevroned Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Itatiaia National Park the best place to see a Golden-chevroned Tanager?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Golden-chevroned Tanager sightings, Itatiaia National Park ranks 2nd at about 50%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 70%).
Which relatives of the Golden-chevroned Tanager live in Itatiaia National Park?
Same genus: Thraupis
The closest relatives of the Golden-chevroned Tanager that you can see in Itatiaia National Park (genus Thraupis, Typical Tanagers) are Sayaca Tanager (about 60%) and Palm Tanager (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-chevroned Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-chevroned Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Itatiaia National Park (1,228 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.