What are the chances of seeing an Amber-Winged Glider in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Amber-Winged Glider sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 219th most-seen of the 296 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Amber-Winged Glider in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
September and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Amber-Winged Glider in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and December–May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Amber-Winged Glider?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Amber-Winged Glider sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaeng Krachan National Park the best place to see an Amber-Winged Glider?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Amber-Winged Glider sightings, Kaeng Krachan National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Amber-Winged Glider live in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Amber-Winged Glider that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Russet Percher (about 30%), Blue Marsh Hawk (about 20%) and Orange Skimmer (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Amber-Winged Glider sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Amber-Winged Glider is recorded against all the insects logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.